<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vinall, Maria</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Watson, Karol E.</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013 Cardiovascular Prevention Guidelines: A Discussion of the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MD Conference Express</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014-05-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">34-36</style></pages><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Particular sections of the much anticipated 2013 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) cardiovascular (CV) prevention guidelines have received both applause and criticism. This article presents experts' views on a few of the more divisive recommendations.</style></abstract><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">14</style></volume></record></records></xml>