<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kuznar, Wayne</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Higher Rate of Device Success with Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve (CHOICE)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MD Conference Express</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014-05-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">16-17</style></pages><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In the first head-to-head randomized comparison of two devices used for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis, a balloon-expandable transcatheter valve was found to have a higher rate of device success than a self-expanding valve. This article discusses data from the Comparison of Transcatheter Heart Valves in High Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: Medtronic CoreValve Versus Edwards SAPIEN XT trial [CHOICE; Abdel-Wahab M et al. JAMA 2014].</style></abstract><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">14</style></volume></record></records></xml>