<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rizzo, Toni</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Miller, Nathaniel</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cesarean Delivery Rates among Nulliparous Women with Elective Induction of Labor Compared with Expectant Management at 39 Weeks' Gestation</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MD Conference Express</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014-06-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">14-15</style></pages><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Elective induction of labor (IOL) is not uncommon at 39 weeks' gestation, but prospective data on perinatal outcomes and ultimate mode of delivery are limited compared to expectant management. The Elective Induction of Nulliparous Labor study [Miller NR et al. Obstet Gynecol 2014; NCT01076062] objectives were to evaluate the incidence of cesarean delivery and perinatal outcomes among women who deliver by elective IOL compared with spontaneous labor.</style></abstract><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">14</style></volume></record></records></xml>