<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nierengarten, Mary Beth</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Heinemann, Klaas</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Low Perforation Rates with Intrauterine Devices Regardless of Device Type</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MD Conference Express</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014-06-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11-12</style></pages><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The risk of perforation from the use of intrauterine devices (IUDs) is low and similar for levonorgestrel-releasing (LNG) IUDs and copper IUDs. Compared with copper IUDs, however, LNG-IUDs were noted to have a significant reduction in the incidence of pregnancy, including a marked reduction in ectopic pregnancy. This article presents the results of the European Active Surveillance Study for Intrauterine Devices (EURAS-IUD; NCT0046/1175), a large, multinational, prospective, controlled, noninterventional study, conducted to compare the risk of perforation during and after insertion of 2 types of IUDs: LNG-IUDs and copper IUDs.</style></abstract><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">14</style></volume></record></records></xml>