<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vinall, Maria</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Reddy, Vivek Y.</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Promising and Feasible: Leadless Cardiac Pacing</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MD Conference Express</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014-07-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">19-20</style></pages><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Implantation of a leadless cardiac pacemaker (LCP) offers the potential to eliminate the need for the pocket, generator, and connections in most pacemaker systems—the transvenous lead subcutaneous pocket, subcutaneous pulse generator, and intra-system connections. This article discusses a prospective, nonrandomized Evaluation of a New Cardiac Pacemaker study [LEADLESS; Reddy VY et al. Circulation 2014], which found that permanent leadless cardiac pacing is safe and feasible at 1 year after implantation in patients with an indication for single-chamber (ventricular) pacing.</style></abstract><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">14</style></volume></record></records></xml>