<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vinall, Maria</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bogunovic, Ljiljana</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Second-Generation Meniscal Repair Systems as Effective as First Generation</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MD Conference Express</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014-10-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">20-21</style></pages><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Second-generation suture-based devices for meniscal repair appear to have overcome some of the complications associated with first-generation all-inside designs, but there have been no outcome studies of these second-generation systems beyond 3 years. This article discusses the results of a retrospective review of 83 consecutive meniscus repairs (either isolated or combined with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [ACLR]), which reported an 84% success rate with a second-generation all-inside repair system at a minimum of a 5-year follow-up.</style></abstract><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">23</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">14</style></volume></record></records></xml>