<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Parry, Nicola</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Brockmeier, Stephen F.</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Subpectoral Technique Improves Biomechanical Performance of Biceps Tenodesis</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MD Conference Express</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014-10-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">16-16</style></pages><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">This article discusses data from a matched cadaveric study that was conducted to compare the arthroscopic suprapectoral and open subpectoral techniques for biceps tenodesis. The data showed that the arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis technique results in a more proximal tenodesis location, tends to overtension the biceps, and has a significantly reduced ultimate load to failure, compared with an open subpectoral biceps tenodesis technique.</style></abstract><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">23</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">14</style></volume></record></records></xml>