<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vinall, Maria</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Chen, Shao-Liang</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">FFR- and Angiography-Guided Provisional Side Branch Stenting Offer Similar Benefits</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MD Conference Express</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014-10-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6-7</style></pages><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Results of the Comparison of FFR-guided and Angiography-guided Provisional Stenting for True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Randomized, Multi-center Clinical Trial [DKCRUSH-VI] show that fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided and angiography-guided provisional side branch stenting of true coronary bifurcation lesions are associated with similar rates of 1-year major adverse cardiac events.</style></abstract><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">30</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">14</style></volume></record></records></xml>