<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nichols, Emma Hitt</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lefrancois, Tina</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Differences in Component Revision and Reoperation for Ankle Arthroscopy Implants</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MD Conference Express</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014-11-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">13-14</style></pages><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">End-stage ankle arthritis is frequently treated by total ankle arthroscopy (TAA); with modern prostheses, clinical outcomes and patient-reported satisfaction are good. This article discusses a study determining any differences in clinical outcomes based on the 4 TAA implants (STAR, Hintegra, Agility, and Mobility).</style></abstract><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">34</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">14</style></volume></record></records></xml>