<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nierengarten, Mary Beth</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bansback, Nick</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Triple Therapy More Cost-effective than Biologic First in Patients Who Fail MTX</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MD Conference Express</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014-12-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">13-14</style></pages><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">For patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who fail methotrexate (MTX), using a biologic instead of triple therapy first is not a cost-effective use of health care resources due to the large additional costs for very small benefits. This article presents the results of a randomized noninferiority trial that compared the cost-effectiveness of treating patients who fail MTX with a biologic first or adding triple therapy followed by a biologic.</style></abstract><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">51</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">14</style></volume></record></records></xml>