<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bittner, Dennis</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Azzaz, S.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kacem, S.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ouali, S.</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Researchers Recommend Septal vs Apical Pacing Following the Results of a Randomized Study</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MD Conference Express</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014-12-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9-9</style></pages><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Right ventricular apical pacing can generate a nonphysiological activation sequence, leading to mechanical dyssynchrony in the left ventricle. To test whether right ventricular septal stimulation is superior to right ventricular apical stimulation, researchers conducted a randomized study comparing dyssynchronies resulting from pacing at the 2 locations.</style></abstract><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">54</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">14</style></volume></record></records></xml>