<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cunningham, Muriel</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michaud, Kaleb</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Higher Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios Seen with Biologics in the TEAR Trial</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MD Conference Express</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013-01-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">18-19</style></pages><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">As additional treatments have been approved for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), researchers have used clinical trial data to analyze the cost effectiveness of these new drugs. Since 1998, more than 30 cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) have been conducted, with highly variable results. This article presents the CEA results of patient-level data from the Treatment of Early Aggressive Rheumatoid Arthritis trial [TEAR; NCT00259610], a large, randomized, double-blind clinical study.</style></abstract><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">18</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">13</style></volume></record></records></xml>