<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vinall, Maria</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nicolau, Julia</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Update on ACR/EULAR RA Classification Criteria: What Have We Learned?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MD Conference Express</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012-08-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">23-25</style></pages><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In 2010, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) proposed new classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis [Aletaha D et al. Arthritis Rheum 2010]. These criteria were developed with the objective that they would facilitate the identification of subjects in earlier stages of disease. This article discusses the 2010 criteria and their impact on clinical practice.</style></abstract><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12</style></volume></record></records></xml>