<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kuznar, Wayne</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kimura, Yukiko</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Treating Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Now and in the Future</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MD Conference Express</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2012-12-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">27-28</style></pages><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Medication use patterns in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) are changing gradually and reflect significant treatment variability. Data from recent Phase 3 clinical trials of 2 biologic inhibiting agents, tocilizumab and canakinumab, may prompt further changes in treatment choices in the future, as these 2 agents show impressive response rates [Yokota S et al Lancet 2008; De Benedetti F et al. Arthritis Rheum 2010; De Benedetti F et al. Arthritis Rheum 2011; Brunner HI et al. ACR 2012 Abstract 759].</style></abstract><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">19</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12</style></volume></record></records></xml>