<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vinall, Maria</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Youssef, Ali A.</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">TRA is an Alternative to a TFA for PCI in Patients with ULMCA Stenosis</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MD Conference Express</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011-09-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10-11</style></pages><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Compared with a transfemoral approach (TFA), using a transradial approach (TRA) for unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease results in a comparable procedural success rate, a lower rate of vascular complications, similar fluoroscopy time, and shorter hospital stays. TRA should be considered as an alternative to TFA in performing percutaneous coronary intervention for ULMCA diseases.</style></abstract><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></volume></record></records></xml>