<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sinclair, Heather Q.</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jovin, Tudor G.</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Results from the Merci Registry: Clinical Outcomes and Recanalization Rates</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MD Conference Express</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010-03-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">19-20</style></pages><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Clinical outcomes, safety, and recanalization rates using the Merci retriever embolectomy device are similar to those seen in previous prospective studies. In this study, investigators compared data from the Merci Registry with pooled data from the Mechanical Embolus Removal in Cerebral Ischemia [MERCI] and Multi MERCI trials to evaluate the clinical outcomes, safety, and recanalization rates of the Merci retriever embolectomy device in a “real world” setting.</style></abstract><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></volume></record></records></xml>