<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">,</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">DANPACE: Dual-Chamber Pacing Preferred in Sick Sinus Syndrome</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MD Conference Express</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010-11-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">15-16</style></pages><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dual-chamber pacing improved long-term outcomes compared with single-chamber pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome in the long-term Danish Multicenter Randomized Study on AAIR Versus DDDR Pacing in Sick Sinus Syndrome [DANPACE; NCT00236158] study and should be the preferred pacing mode in these patients.</style></abstract><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">8</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></volume></record></records></xml>