<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vinall, Maria</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Young, William L.</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Multimodality Management of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MD Conference Express</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2009-03-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">30-31</style></pages><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The presence of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVM) confers considerable risk of intracerebral hemorrhage and poor outcome. However, the best way to proceed in patients with unruptured AVMs, or whether to intervene at all, is hotly debated. This article reviews 2 models for decision-making.</style></abstract><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">9</style></volume></record></records></xml>