<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vinall, Phil</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Conaghan, Philip</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Imaging and Painful Joints: Which Technology is Most Appropriate?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MD Conference Express</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2007</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2007-08-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">17-17</style></pages><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Although conventional radiology is often used as the first-line imaging modality in the evaluation of the painful joint, other technologies such as ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging may provide more useful information for the clinician in certain settings. It is of course important to note that the relationship between pain and imaging-detected structural pathology is not always well understood.</style></abstract><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7</style></volume></record></records></xml>