<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mayfield, Eleanor</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hørsted Thyregod, Hans Gustav</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">NOTION Trial</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MD Conference Express</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015-04-24 09:14:01</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">17-18</style></pages><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Transcatheter aortic valve replacement was not superior to surgical aortic valve replacement in the randomized NOTION trial of low-risk patients with aortic valve stenosis. The transcatheter procedure did not significantly reduce the composite rate of death from any cause, stroke, or myocardial infarction at 1 year compared with surgery.</style></abstract><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">15</style></volume></record></records></xml>