<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Shuman, Jill</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tokish, John</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Redefining Critical Bone Loss in Shoulder Instability</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MD Conference Express</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014-10-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10-11</style></pages><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Glenoid bone deficiency has been implicated as a significant risk factor for failure after arthroscopic stabilization, with data suggesting that 20% to 25% glenoid loss is a “critical level” at which this risk increases [Boileau P et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; Boileau P et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014]. However, there is a paucity of data available to indicate whether a lesser degree of bone loss results in better arthroscopic outcomes.</style></abstract><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">23</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">14</style></volume></record></records></xml>