<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hoyle, Brian</style></author></authors><secondary-authors></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">POP Trial: Similar Functional Results in Each Treatment Method for Midshaft Clavicle Fractures</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MD Conference Express</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014-12-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">13-13</style></pages><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Frans-Jasper G. Wijdicks, MD, PhD, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands, reported the results of the randomized controlled Surgical Treatment of Midshaft Clavicular Fractures With Dislocation trial [POP; NTR2438], which compared the short- and mid-term outcomes of plate fixation and intramedullary (IM) nailing. Midshaft fractures were the focus because 80% of all clavicle fractures occur in the midshaft region, and half of the fractures involve dislocation.</style></abstract><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">41</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">14</style></volume></record></records></xml>