<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vinall, Phil</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Diegeler, Anno</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes following on-versus off-CABG Shows Mixed Results</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MD Conference Express</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013-04-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12-13</style></pages><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Although coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is usually performed with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (on-pump CABG), CABG without bypass (off-pump CABG) might reduce the number of major adverse events related to the heart-lung machine and improve outcomes. Investigators discussed the results of 3 studies - the GOPCABE study [Diegeler A et al. N Engl J Med 2013, CORONARY study [Lamy A et al. N Engl J Med 2013], and the PRAGUE 6 trial [NCT00606372] - that tested this hypothesis.</style></abstract><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">13</style></volume></record></records></xml>