<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kuznar, Wayne</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gilbert, Mark R.</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">No Survival Advantage to Using Bevacizumab as First-Line Therapy for Glioblastoma</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MD Conference Express</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013-07-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10-11</style></pages><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Data from a Phase 3 study indicate that the use of bevacizumab (BEV) in glioblastoma should not be extended to the first-line setting. Currently, BEV is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. This article discusses findings from the double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial entitled Temozolomide and Radiation Therapy With or Without Bevacizumab in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma [RTOG 0825; NCT00884741; Gilbert MR et al. J Clin Oncol 2013 (suppl; abstr 1)].</style></abstract><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">13</style></volume></record></records></xml>