<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Rizzo, Toni</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Raungaard, Bent</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SORT-OUT VI: Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Noninferior to Biolimus-Eluting Stent</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MD Conference Express</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013-12-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">17-18</style></pages><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">First-generation drug-eluting stents have reduced the risk of restenosis compared with bare-metal stents; however, these stents may have increased risk of stent thrombosis. Newer generation drug-eluting stents, which are constructed with biocompatible or biodegradable polymers, may have greater efficacy, safety, and device performance. The Randomized Clinical Comparison of Biomatrix Flex and Resolute Integrity trial [SORT-OUT VI; NCT01956448] compared the efficacy and safety of a zotarolimus-eluting stent with a biolimus-eluting stent in a population-based setting.</style></abstract><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">19</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">13</style></volume></record></records></xml>