Summary
Intravenous (IV) insulin is currently the standard of care but requires frequent monitoring and can cause excess hypoglycemia. This article presents results from a pilot study to determine the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of IV exenatide in hyperglycemic cardiac intensive care unit patients [Intravenous Exenatide in Coronary Intensive Care Unit Patients; NCT00736229].
- Insulin
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Diabetes & Endocrinology Clinical Trials
In critically ill patients, persistent hyperglycemia is associated with increased mortality and complications [Kosiborod M et al. Circulation 2005], but low blood glucose is equally dangerous [Marik P. World J Gastrointest Surg 2009]. Intravenous (IV) insulin is currently the standard of care but requires frequent monitoring and can cause excess hypoglycemia. Steven P. Marso, St. Luke's Mid America Heart & Vascular Institute, Kansas City, Missouri, USA, presented results from a pilot study to determine the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of IV exenatide in hyperglycemic cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) patients [Intravenous Exenatide in Coronary Intensive Care Unit Patients; NCT00736229].
Dr. Marso and his colleagues performed a prospective, single-center, open-label, nonrandomized study that compared IV exenatide to insulin controls. The primary outcome measure was average glucose value during a coronary ICU stay of 24 to 48 hours. Secondary outcome measures included number of hypoglycemic episodes in the ICU, number of subjects with >1 ICU hypoglycemic episode or serious adverse event (death, life-threatening event, prolonged hospital stay, disability or incapacity, non-life-threatening event) within 30 days of the discontinuation of the study drug.
Eligibility criteria included age >18 years; admission to the CICU; admission blood glucose (BG) of 140 to 400 mg/dL; primary cardiovascular diagnosis by the attending physician; being under the primary care of the cardiology service; ventilator independence; and the ability to provide informed consent. Exclusion criteria included creatinine clearance <30 mL/min, type 1 diabetes, pregnancy, gastroparesis, insulin treatment (except monotherapy for long-acting basal insulin), admittance to the CICU to measure hemodynamics prior to transplant, or posttransplant procedure.
Exenatide was infused at a fixed dose of 0.05 mcg/min (30-min bolus), then 0.025 mcg/min continuously for 24 to 48 hrs. The drug was benchmarked to 2 insulin control groups: 1) intensive (INT; target BG 90 to 119 mg/dL) and 2) modified (MOD; target BG 100 to 140 mg/dL). Exenatide was infused in 40 patients (age 65 years, 83% male, 63% acute coronary syndromes, 75% type 2 diabetes). Admission BG was 199.3±52.7 mg/dL in exenatide patients and 240.3±44.0 mg/dL in the MOD group (p=0.02). Time to target BG was lower in the exenatide than MOD group (3.9±4.3 vs 9.3±7.4 hours; p<0.001; Figure 1). Drug-related nausea occurred in 8 (20%) exenatide patients; 5 (13%) discontinued use early. Exenatide was associated with a lower BG than MOD.
Of 668 and 745 glucose observations in the exenatide and MOD groups, respectively, there were numerically fewer overall hypoglycemic episodes in the exenatide group (0.9% vs 1.2%; p=0.57), including severe events (0% vs 0.3%; p=0.18). BG in exenatide-treated patients was more frequently within the target range (100 to 140 mg/dL; 37% vs 29%; p<0.001) and within 71 to 140 mg/dL (48% vs 39%; p<0.001) compared with MOD. No serious adverse events were observed in the exenatide group.
The study objective was to determine the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of glucose-lowering with IV exenatide monotherapy in hyperglycemic patients who were admitted to the CICU. The findings suggest that fixed-dose IV exenatide is feasible in hyperglycemic ICU patients, achieves similar efficacy compared with IV insulin, and does not cause severe hypoglycemia.
- © 2011 MD Conference Express