<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jacobson, Anne</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mitchell, Gary F.</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Which Imaging Tools are Best for CV Risk Assessment?</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MD Conference Express</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011-12-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">26-27</style></pages><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Risk stratification tools are critical for classifying cardiovascular (CV) risk and guiding therapy, particularly in asymptomatic patients. In this session, experts discussed new data that support the use of noninvasive imaging modalities as adjuncts to traditional risk factors in CV risk assessment.</style></abstract><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">15</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11</style></volume></record></records></xml>