<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nichols, Emma Hitt</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kong, Jie</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Radiation Method Comparison for Esophageal Carcinoma</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MD Conference Express</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2014-11-01 00:00:00</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">16-16</style></pages><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) are common radiation methods used to treat patients with esophageal cancer. Esophageal carcinoma treatment response to IMRT was not significantly different from 3DCRT, according to results discussed this retrospective analysis article.</style></abstract><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">31</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">14</style></volume></record></records></xml>