<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><xml><records><record><source-app name="HighWire" version="7.x">Drupal-HighWire</source-app><ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nierengarten, Mary Beth</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yeung, Christopher A.</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stabilization Device Superior to Fusion After Decompression for LSS</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MD Conference Express</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015-05-01 11:17:10</style></date></pub-dates></dates><pages><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10-10</style></pages><abstract><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In patients with moderate to severe lumbar spinal stenosis and back pain, use of an interlaminar stabilization device after surgical decompression achieves significantly superior clinical outcomes at 3-year follow-up compared with use of standard treatment with posterolateral fusion, suggesting increasingly favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes with ILS compared with fusion in these patients.</style></abstract><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">7</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">15</style></volume></record></records></xml>