Summary
The oral multikinase inhibitor regorafenib targets multiple pathways involved in tumor development and progression. In the CORRECT study [Grothey A et al. Lancet. 2013], treatment with regorafenib improved overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) disease progression after standard therapies (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.94; 1-sided p?=?.0052). This article presents the results from the Asian Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With Regorafenib or Placebo After Failure of Standard Therapy study [CONCUR; NCT01584830], a trial examining the efficacy and safety of regorafenib in a larger group of Asian patients with mCRC.
- Gastrointestinal Cancers
- Oncology Clinical Trials
- Gastrointestinal Cancers
- Oncology Clinical Trials
The oral multikinase inhibitor regorafenib targets multiple pathways involved in tumor development and progression. In the CORRECT study [Grothey A et al. Lancet. 2013], treatment with regorafenib improved overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) disease progression after standard therapies (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.94; 1-sided p = .0052). The CORRECT study population included 15% Asian patients, primarily from Japan. Jin Li, MD, PhD, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China, presented the results from the Asian Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Treated With Regorafenib or Placebo After Failure of Standard Therapy study [CONCUR; NCT01584830], a trial examining the efficacy and safety of regorafenib in a larger group of Asian patients with mCRC.
Conducted at 25 clinical centers in mainland China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, the Republic of Korea, and Vietnam, the CONCUR study enrolled eligible patients who had stage IV adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum that had progressed within 3 months after receiving standard therapy and an ECOG Performance Status (PS) ≤ 1. A minimum of 2 prior treatments, including fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan, was a requirement for participation. Previous treatment with anti—vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or anti—epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) targeted therapies was permitted.
Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to best supportive care plus regorafenib (160 mg/d) or best supportive care plus placebo for the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle [Li J et al. Ann Oncol. 2014 (abstr O-0023)]. The randomization was stratified by the number of single versus multiple metastatic sites and time from diagnosis of metastatic disease to randomization (< 18 vs ≤ 18 months). Patients received treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. OS was the primary end point, and progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, disease control rate (DCR), and safety variables were secondary end points. A stratified log-rank test (1-sided α, 0.2) was used to analyze survival.
A total of 204 patients were randomized in the study between May 2012 and January 2013 to receive regorafenib (n = 136) or placebo (n = 68). The overall median age was 57 years, and the baseline and demographic characteristics were similar between treatment arms. Seventy-five percent of patients had an ECOG PS of 1, and 25% had an ECOG PS of 0. Approximately half of the patients had received ≤ 3 treatment lines for mCRC, and 41% had not received treatment with either an anti-VEGF or anti-EGFR agent.
As of the data analysis cutoff date (November 29, 2013), regorafenib significantly improved OS as compared with placebo (HR, 0.550; 95% CI, 0.395 to 0.765; 1-sided p = .0002). The median OS was 8.8 months for regorafenib-treated patients versus 6.3 months for placebo. The median PFS was 3.2 months for regorafenib and 1.7 months for placebo (HR, 0.311; 95% CI, 0.222 to 0.435; 1-sided p < .0001). The DCR was also greater in regorafenib-treated patients (52% vs 7% for placebo).
Adverse events in the study were consistent with the regorafenib safety profile in Asian patients. In regorafenib-treated patients, the most frequently reported treatment-emergent grade ≥ 3 adverse events were hand-foot skin reaction (16%), hypertension (12%), hyperbilirubinemia (12%), elevated liver enzymes (aspartate aminotransferase 10%, alanine aminotransferase 8%), hypophosphatemia (9%), anemia (7%), and hyperlipasemia (7%). No events of liver failure or pancreatitis were reported.
- © 2014 MD Conference Express®